Product Testing: Navigating the complicated process to success
Last week David Dayton at Silk Road International wrote a post on testing procedures in China. It’s clear that his experiences have been frustrating, to say the least. Testing our products for lead content was a fairly simple matter (relatively speaking!) but in other industries the quality testing can be very difficult to complete.
He gives some good advice on how to improve your chances of getting testing completed correctly.
First, if at first you don’t succeed, try, try again! David’s experiences indicate that testing varies from factory to factory, so if your product fails the testing, it could be worth re-sending to another certified factory.
Three clients switched testing companies after products failed their first round of tests. ALL three had the exact same products pass the tests after they switched to a different testing company! We pulled and sent all the SAME samples for ALL three clients and mailed them ourselves to the two different testing companies so I can personally testify that NOTHING changed in the samples between tests. But the results were different—radically different.
If a mistake was made in the testing procedure, many places will re-test for free – but that would mean knowing that a mistake was made, and then getting the factory to admit it. Not easy!
If there are problems with the testing methodology you can get the tests redone for free (at least that’s the policy of the two companies that we’ve been working with). The problem is, unless you get them to admit themselves that there is a mistake/problem, you’ll never know that maybe you could have either passed the tests or you could have your stuff retested again for free. This is significant when testing for a single item can cost thousands of dollars.
Another big issue is that many Chinese suppliers do not understand the importance of product testing. With such a range of short cut options available, why pay so much money to test every product every time?
The fact that we are actually testing our own products when suppliers could either buy fake certificates of completed tests (ANY test you want: LHAMA, RohS, CPSIA, ASTM, etc., 1,500RMB) or just change the dates on older tests (“It’s all the same materials.”) was completely not understood. In fact, the idea that we would be testing and were tying payments to test results made more than one factory very nervous. We had one back out completely and two others expressed concerns along the lines of, “But we’re not sure if we can control all the materials. What do we do if they don’t pass the tests?” Which is precisely the point—you need to “control all the materials.”
David includes a snapshot of their process for getting testing done for products, and holding suppliers to those standards.
For us the processes usually goes something like this. Contract out with the supplier for the testing sample process—these means that we pay for what is often free, but we get agreements (in Chinese) that we can enforce later when we have to make sure that production matches 100%. Pull our own samples, send to independent third party testing company, sign new contracts and initiate PO’s with suppliers and then pull, test and repeat.
Of course, a good process doesn’t ensure a smooth run. While they may not understand the need for testing, suppliers understand the investment of time and money in the testing process. This investment, they realise, ties the buyer to them – to their product specifically.
Where it gets really frustrating for us is [when] suppliers realize…they now have the upper hand. Since they are now “legit” they figure that can raise the price as much as they want (and request copies of our testing results) to release any goods. . .This type of problem is difficult, but usually resolvable; even though getting past these changes and into actual production can sometimes cost a lot (time, money, face, emotion).
What’s not resolvable is when a factory decides that they need to save money (aka: make more profit of this one order) and change either some of the raw materials or change part of the already approved production processes. If either of these things happens when doing both pre-production and in-line testing the supplier is going to get caught almost every time–but it still happens, often Of course, now the entire production run will be rejected. And if you didn’t have a fight on your hands before, you most likely will now.
As you can see, the testing process is long and difficult, on many levels. The bottom line is, though, that for many industries this testing is essential. No matter how difficult it is to monitor the process and ensure that what you receive from the supplier really does match the required quality standards, YOU as the importer, will be the one held accountable should there be a problem down the line.
After having gone through this process over the last 18 months with 4 different clients in completely different industries, I would be completely shocked if all the product in the US that is “CPSIA Certified” really is, in fact, certified. There are just too many tantalizing options for individuals in the process to cut corners and take a huge one-off profit; there are too many people that just don’t understand how important testing standards are; and there are just too many people involved that will NOT be held accountable if, in 5 years, some component is found to not comply with the standards.
What about you? What are your experiences with product testing in China?


