International apparel manufacturing and sourcing. If we don't make it, we can find it.

Archive for October, 2010

What to do when your supplier sees no reason to continue

Tanya Crossman

Tanya Crossman

David Dayton wrote a good “story” post this week. He tells the story of a situation his company was in where their supplier did not want to continue working on an order, and the strategies they employed to motivate production.

No matter what the reason, when your factory has officially passed the we’re-losing-money-on-this-project point, expect to see product laying around, no more QC, no managers, and expect no one to answer your calls.

Here are David’s four main action points – how they moved things forward:

1. We continually reassured them that even though things were late we were indeed still interested in the remaining qtty’s.
2. We then reassured them that we were going to not only pay for what we ordered, but we would pay on time and pay for any additional costs that were due to changes or our mistakes
3. I went into the factory and met with the owner.
4. To get what we wanted (product done correctly, at the same price, ASAP) we basically gave in on everything that we could that didn’t affect product quality or cost us cash out of pocket.

In our situation we had two positions of strength–the outstanding balance of payments and our physical presence in the factory.

David also makes a good point about dealing with factory managers, and how they can be part of the problem:

Managers, the very people that you’re depending on to help you push through difficulties, may be the problem.  Just like back home, different departments in large organizations work on budgets and they allot time to specific projects.  They when they overspend in either time or money, they get in trouble.  Precisely because they are tied to these specific limits they can’t always see the big picture.  Sometime a single project that busts their budget is the worst thing they can imagine and so they freeze up or stop the hemorrhaging in their department.  When this happens, you need to get up a level, get above the managerial trees and recruit a GM or owner to direct these lower lever guys to do what’s best for the factory (as opposed to what’s best for their personal fiefdom).

This is one of the reasons we prefer to deal with smaller factories. That way we deal with the boss, the one who stands to lose and gain the most by getting the order done right. The boss of a small factory has the power to rearrange everything if he decides it is necessary.

Read the full story here.

In China, economic considerations aren’t the whole story

Tanya Crossman

Tanya Crossman

Last week Dan Harris posted his thoughts on an article by Joseph Sternberg, Editor of the Business Asia column at The Wall Street Journal. It’s worth dropping over to read the whole post, but I wanted to highlight Dan’s main point:

Like it or not, China no longer feels terribly inclined to care much about the foreign companies in its midst and it will not hesitate to place big picture politics over economics. Those who believe otherwise are neglecting real risk.

I couldn’t agree more. To say that China’s goal in all foreign policy is to increase economic opportunities for China is to oversimplify the situation beyond sense. The Chinese government is looking out for China’s interests, yes, but those interests are not merely economic. Political stability is a high priority, and at times this will supercede the priority of economic opportunity.

Anyone doing business in China needs to pay attention to the larger political landscape; economics alone will not tell you the whole story.

Washing Care Icons – do YOU know what they mean?

Tanya Crossman

Tanya Crossman

Today I want to share something a little different with you. The Telegraph (a UK newspaper) published an article online last month about care labels on clothing. It turns out that very few people can decipher the detailed instructions conveyed by care icons.

Care icons are supposed to simplify instructions – to allow consumers to understand how to care for their clothes properly, regardless of language. If no one can read the language of care symbols, however, they aren’t doing their job.

Nine in 10 people are unable to decipher common symbols used on clothes labels. . . A third of people surveyed said that they recognised none of the six symbols shown. . . Just 10 per cent sign knew the sign for “do not dry clean”, while only 12 per cent were familiar with “drip dry only”.

The statistics are based on a survey of 2,000 people in the UK, who were shown 6 care symbols and asked what each meant. I must admit, I did a terrible job myself.

It makes me wonder why awareness is so low. Is the system of symbols too complicated? Do a large percentage of people simply not care about the best way to care for their clothes?

Awareness was highest among 18- to 29-year-old women – for whom taking care of clothes is clearly important.

I think the conclusion that these women are more careful with their clothes is a logical assumption, but we don’t know that for sure. At any rate, it’s interesting to me that younger women are more familiar with care symbols than those who have been doing laundry for decades.

It would be helpful to find out HOW they know what the symbols mean. Are they working in clothing retail and have been trained to know? Are they researching what the care icons on their own clothing means, so they can care for them in the best manner? It’s even possible they know which items will be difficult to care for before making a purchase.

Personally, I try to select clothes that are easy to care for; I have in the past rejected items I liked because I knew I wasn’t willing to iron them every time I wore them, or to always dry clean them. Even if I understood perfectly how an item should be cared for, chances are I wouldn’t change my laundry routine for it.

What about you? Do you understand the washing care icons on your clothing? Do you care?
Why do you think younger women are more aware of care icons?

The 2 Kinds of “Yes”

Danny Coyle

Danny Coyle

I recently found myself in a position where I need to make a quick decision to suspend operations in a department.  I spoke with some of my mentors about it, and they said it was a good idea.  I was not in a place to have a physical meeting with my top leaders, so I sent them an e-mail detailing the decision that needed to be made.

We all decided to suspend the operation for the time-being and go ahead with the plan.  With the decision made and plans moving forward, I was surprised when two of my top leaders came to me later. They asked questions indicating insecurity regarding the decision we had made together.

I then realized I had not received the “yes” I had expected.

When leading a team, beware of the 2 kinds of “yes”.

Before I describe the two kinds of “yes”, there are two components to engaging a team of leaders in a decision.  These components are Heart and Mind.

When making key decisions, your team needs to say “yes” with their minds. They need to think through all the positive and negative outcomes of the decision, along with resource consumption, potential output, etc. Those questions must be asked and answered in a rational way. A good decision will not be made without engaging the Mind.

You also need to engage the Heart. Your team needs to feel that the rational decision is the best one – to have that “gut feeling” that what is logical is also right overall. Even if your team has thought through the plan and engaged with the Mind, unless they also engage with the Heart, they will be prone to uncertainty. When you can engage their hearts beforehand, a new venture has a much better chance at success.

That said, here are the 2 kinds of yes.

The ‘We are with you’ Yes

Sometimes a leader connects with his team in a way that brings the team on board 100%. The team is behind the leader, supporting the new direction, convinced that it is the best way forward. This happens when the leader engages both the Minds and Hearts of the team. When a team is engaged like this, they are willing to fight to bring about the vision; they will jump through rings of fire to make it happen.

The ‘No one will get killed’ yes

Sometimes a team will go along with new direction while remaining unconvinced that it is the best way forward. They say “yes,” but what they really mean is “not no”. This happens when the leader fails to engage his team on a Heart level; the decision making is happening on a purely Mind level. The team can’t find a logical reason to say “no,” can’t find anything to say that will dissuade the strong leader from going forward with the plan. Team members not engaged on a Heart level are not sold on the decision they have made. Later, when facing the consequences of the decision, they will not strongly support the new direction, and may try to wiggle out of their part in it.

The second type of yes happens when the leader does not do a good job of engaging his team and winning their hearts for the decision. This lack is compounded when the leader doesn’t stop to check whether the team is engaged during the decision-making process. The team may be saying yes on a practical level, without it ever being a whole-hearted, “we are with you!” sort of yes. A good decision is of course a rational decision, but the heart is a critical component of the “yes” you need from your team. They must be fully engaged both in Mind and Heart in order for a new venture to fully succeed.

Most of the time, people don’t have the vocabulary or courage to explain that a leader has not engaged their hearts.  It is up to the leader to determine if the heart of the team is engaged or not.  This is a challenging task, and worthy of another post.

In my case, the decision to temporarily shut down the operation in question for a time was the right decision, and we reaped the rewards for this decision. I learned a valuable lesson without paying a big price in negative consequences – dodged a bullet with that one! On the other hand, I missed an opportunity to engage the hearts of my team. If I were to do it again, I would give more scrutiny to the position of their hearts before making, and moving forward with, the decision.

Next time we make a big decision like this, I know that I’ll be looking for them to say yes with their not only minds, but with their hearts as well.

Perspectives on Guanxi

Tanya Crossman

Tanya Crossman

China Law Blog is one of the top China business blogs around. They just started a new series, “How We Really Feel About China,” which looks like a good place to start reading if you’re not a subscriber already. Part one is about Guanxi; it’s a practical, realistic look at how guanxi does (doesn’t) work for foreigners.

Guanxi is developed with individuals, not organizations; when the individual is no longer involved, guanxi is no longer a protection against problems.

Our position is essentially that for the overwhelming majority of foreign companies doing business in China, guanxi is no substitute for needing to scrupulously abide by China’s laws.

A list of points elaborating on this is given, and then quotes from several other leading China business blogs backing up this understanding of guanxi.

  • No foreigner can recreate a Chinese-style guanxi network
  • Connections with local government officials are short-term and can be abruptly terminated.
  • The Chinese provider of guanxi may suddenly disappear.
  • A project based on guanxi gives too much power to the Chinese side of the deal.
The article is well worth reading for the discussion and quotes, different perspective on the same issue, but here’s the bottom line on guanxi from CLB:
  1. It takes time to cultivate.
  2. It is not a substitute for good business sense.
  3. It does not make a bad business deal a good one.
  4. It should not be used as a way to skirt the law.
  5. It makes sense to have good relationships with people in China, just as it makes sense to have good relationships with people everywhere.
  6. Guanxi does sometimes make things go more smoothly.
  7. None of us have any real clue as to whether guanxi should or should not be capitalized when written in English.
  8. Most who claim to have serious guanxi do not.
  9. An even greater percentage of foreigners who claim to have serious guanxi do not.
  10. The value of guanxi varies from industry to industry. For instance, I understand that guanxi is critical to the media business in China and to securing government contracts; it is of virtually no importance in getting your trademark or WFOE registered in China.

More reading on Guanxi:

Guanxi – is it essential to business dealings in China?

Face and Business Relationships in China

Partnering with Small Factories

Interview with Jill Coyle on “Expat Women” website

Jill Coyle was recently interviewed by Expat Women for the business ideas section of their website. The interview is now live on the site; you can read it here

Jill Coyle

Jill Coyle

Here’s a sneak peek – Jill’s 5 tips for women starting a business abroad:

1) Find support in all phases of your business

2) Take charge of your leadership development

3) “Do it afraid”

4) Create a plan that will make time for you

5) Discover your strength zone