International apparel manufacturing and sourcing. If we don't make it, we can find it.

Posts Tagged ‘Business Relationships’

Working well with Chinese suppliers

Tanya Crossman

Tanya Crossman

Last week Renaud wrote a piece about working with Chinese suppliers I enjoyed.

He starts out by saying that when you first start working with Chinese suppliers, you may notice a need to change certain habits.

It is very important to define the product requirements in the smallest details, including the labeling and the packaging.

I’m with him here! It’s important not to make assumptions. Don’t rely upon the supplier’s “common sense”. The problem with this isn’t that your supplier is “stupid” but rather that he doesn’t know what you’re thinking. You have a clear idea in your head of what a label should look like, whether you realize it or not. It may be that you think it “obvious” what a label should look like. If you do not communicate these specifics clearly, don’t complain when the supplier goes with his own assumptions of what makes for a good label!

Labeling and packaging are aspects of production we have changed our system on over time. Originally, all product was shipped to our warehouse where we did our own quality control and per-piece inspection, before labelling and packaging every piece by hand, ensuring no mistakes. At the time, this was something our supplier could not handle to a standard which was acceptable to us. Over time, as we have trained our supplier and improved other aspects of production, we have moved more of the labeling and packaging tasks to the production factory. When punctuality, quality, quantity, and color tolerances were all happening well, we added these extra jobs.

Quality and timing are never guaranteed. Expect a very bad experience, and you might be pleasantly surprised.

If by “expect a bad situation” he means “plan for the worst” then I am in total agreement! Things go wrong. It happens. It happens when you’ve made the same product at the same factory with no problems before. It happens when you have time to recover and when you don’t. Having a contingency plan ahead of time saves time and stress when those unforeseen problems crop up. Some questions to think about:

  • What will I do if the product is not ready on time?
  • When do I need it, as opposed to when I want it?
  • How will I respond if product quality is unacceptable?
  • How do I prioritize different production values (punctuality, cost, quality…)?
  • What scenario would force me to cancel the order?

Monitor production closely and micro-manage the whole process.

Yes, yes, yes! Keep in regular contact with your supplier – make sure you know the specifics of what’s happening with production. This kind of micro-managing helps not because your supplier is not going to look out for you (although that can be the case on occasion) but rather that your supplier may well have a different set of values to you. He may value punctuality over quality, or price over time – whereas your values may be opposite. This shows out when things go wrong (which they inevitably do, eventually, even to the most reliable of suppliers). When a choice has to be made -such as “I can either get them done on time OR at the price/quality promised” – the supplier will do what seems best to HIM, which may not be your own preference.

If you know what’s going on at every step of production, you have a chance to step in and make those calls yourself, rather than finding out weeks later what the supplier decided to do. We have several times averted what could have been problematic issues simply by asking specific questions and letting our preferences/values be known. When production was inevitably delayed, we knew early enough to accomodate the delay, rather than promising a delivery date to our own buyers we would later find out we could not keep.

Don’t take everything they tell you for granted. Once production is under way, in 50% of cases you are not told the truth.

I don’t entirely agree here. Although there certainly are unscrupulous suppliers out there who will lie and cheat and do whatever they can to make a fast buck, these “deceptions” aren’t always so malicious in intent. Sometimes it is simply a case of different priorities, leadership styles, or manners of dealing with conflict. While it is good to assume you don’t have the whole story, let it be a healthy awareness rather than an overly suspicious nature.

Don’t promise anything beyond the next order. It is useless. Your counter-party thinks short-term and in a distributive manner (“there is a pie to share, and I want the bigger half”).

Again, I’m not in total agreement here. I absolutely believe you should never promise a future order you can’t guarantee you’ll be placing with your current supplier, longterm relationships are very beneficial. Saying you are going to place an order later won’t gain you any extra leverage with your current problems, but a history of placing regular orders will. Chinese suppliers look more at your past history than at future possibilities. While this means you have no benefit when starting out, it does mean there is benefit in sticking with an imperfect but proficient supplier rather than constantly looking for a better supplier every time. Over time, a supplier will learn your values, know what details you get upset over, and future orders (and problems) will be worked through more smoothly. (This is especially true when you work with smaller factories).

I remember working with a buyer who had set up a very strong (nearly bullet-proof) system for avoiding getting burned. . .He had a theory that once a relationship has turned sour–for whatever reason–he’d better cut his costs and stop everything right away with the supplier in question. I saw first-hand how brutally he acted against a poor supplier who had committed an involuntary mistake. . .That supplier got about 100,000 USD worth of product cancelled, and the importer lost a relatively good supplier. The bottom line is to try to understand the real situation. It is not easy, but it is far better than assuming the worse and resorting to knee-jerk reactions.

Here’s the important part – if you persevere through small/unintentional mistakes, problems that come from ignorance or bad planning rather than from malicious intent, you can train your supplier over time, improving their quality while building a relationship. Giving up at the first small sign of trouble means you’ll never realize the benefits of a long-term supplier relationship.

Do you have any long-term relationships with suppliers you cherish?
How have your supplier relationships changed over time?

Working with your spouse

Jill Coyle

Jill Coyle

While leading a talented group of female entrepreneurs at the Women in Business conference in September, I learned that 4 of the 6 entrepreneurs on the stage (myself included) worked with their spouses.

This led to some interesting discussion as one of the panelists shared that she’d actually had to “fire” her husband and tell him to go start his own business.

Here are some of the things we female entrepreneurs shared about the joys and challenges of working with our husbands.

Some of the challenges

Work doesn’t stop.

One panelist shared that she and her husband had a difficult time leaving work at the office. They continued to discuss work over dinner, during vacation, on Saturday, etc.

Home life can spill over into work

If a husband and wife are having a “discussion” (oh, alright, let’s call it a “fight”), we often find it challenging to not let that fight affect our relationship once we’re in the office.

Personality conflict

For some business/marriage partners, working together brought out the best in them – they balanced each other perfectly, offset each other’s weaknesses, etc. For some, it was a major clash of the titans -  they drove each other so crazy that they had to dissolve the partnership…or totally risk their marriage. As one woman so aptly put it, “I can be married to you – I just can’t be your business partner!”

The joys

Total trust

One great thing about being business partners with your spouse is that (most likely) you totally trust your spouse. I’ve heard so many horror-stories, especially in China, about “partners” running off and stealing the whole business. That’s a lot less likely to happen when you are married to your business partner.

Balance each other

For this group of women anyway, most of them talked about how they work so well with their spouse. One person handles the staff, the other the sales and output; their strengths go hand in hand. They’re able to build each other up – and soften some of the rough edges.

Sharing

One great thing about building a successful company with your spouse is that you do it together. It is something you accomplish together – you can put your arm around your business partner and say, “Wow, look what we are doing together!”

What about you? Do you work with your spouse (or have you done so in the past)? Share with us some of your stories.

Business Risks in China

Tanya Crossman

Tanya Crossman

I recently stumbled onto Thunder Post - there are some good posts on international business and I’ll take some more time to have a look around later. Right now I want to bring to your attention a post from November – an interview with Neal Beatty,  Regional Director (Global Client Services) with the company Control Risks.

Overall some good and solid advice; worth reading through the whole piece if you want a more detailed advice on business risks in China (read it here).

I enjoyed the way Neal pointed to a common sense, middle-road philosophy to risk in China. To treat China as the same as everywhere else is no worse than to think China is totally different to everywhere else. Some things hold true in every market; some differences have a huge effect on business.

Everyone’s read the books on “doing business in China” and that’s a great start for people new to the country. But that’s just scratching the surface, and often seems to lead managers to over-emphasize or over-simplify a few features of operating environment… There’s also a tendency even these days to get carried away with the “China is different” concept, and lose sight of commercial and risk-management principles and processes the company applies elsewhere. China is different in many ways and understanding the differences is vital, but that doesn’t mean there’s some mysterious formula here that only a few people understand – like everywhere else, you need a well-informed, comprehensive and rigorously planned out approach to managing risk, not silver bullets.
Neal was asked about risks common to business in China. Lots has been said about the risks associated with corruption and IP, but I was pleased to see Neal highlight risks in the supply chain and HR. Knowing where all the pieces are coming from is important – it can be difficult to control the supply chain in a place where subcontracting is extremely common. As for HR, it is important to be very clear on what labor laws require – there can be local requirements separate to national regulations. Hiring foreign staff also requires a lot of precision, including which companies can legally hire a resident alien and sponsor their work permit and visa.
One of the most serious potential risks to any business in China is the tacit acceptance of the “This is China” approach to business ethics and compliance issues… By condoning “low level” corruption within the organization, there is a serious risk of it getting out of control and in the worst case putting the entire operation in jeopardy. A zero tolerance approach is certainly not easy, and requires time, effort and budget, but I would say it is the best way to operate in China, just as in other parts of the world. And it is essential that senior management lay down the law and set out the company culture towards such issues from the very start.
Neal has touched on something very important here – the importance of senior management in making this part of company culture. The topic of corruption is raised in most Imports Oriental job interviews. We talk to shortlisted candidates about the value we place on honesty and integrity, including when it comes to bribes and other ways to curry favor. Employees sent to visit suppliers on site or at a trade show are given a clear policy on what they can/cannot accept from the supplier, services they are not permitted to provide, etc. These conversations can be uncomfortable, but are part of clarifying where the line in the sand is. For example, is it okay for the supplier to buy lunch for our staff in a nice restaurant? What should our staff not do with a potential supplier, even when done in order to build up a relationship? Laying down the answers to these questions, and the reason behind the choices, BEFORE someone is in the situation makes it clear what our company’s policies and expectations are.
I don’t believe Chinese people are any different in terms of morals or bad behavior than someone from Northern Ireland. But in China, there are cultural norms that sometimes conflict with the corporate expectations. For example, the concept of a conflict of interest is not understood in the same way as in the EU /US. To many Chinese people it seems perfectly reasonable to consider engaging a supplier owned by a family member or old school classmate. After all, I trust these people far more than some random supplier that approaches me at a trade fair.
A good example of the difference between a moral issue and a cultural issue. What may seem a clear-cut case of business ethics in the US or Europe may not be seen the same way in China.
Where these three areas (political v cultural v commercial) often overlap is when doing business away from the big Tier One cities. Generally speaking, the influence of local politics on local business is more unrestrained away from the biggest cities. This can pose its own set of unique risks that can only be mitigated by a very thorough due diligence process prior to forming a business relationship in that location.
Another reason to do your research ahead of time – even if you’ve been in China for a while, a new location may have different hoops to jump through.
I don’t think any company can run “risk free”, no matter what sector or what size of operation. From the largest MNC with multiple manufacturing and distribution facilities around China, to the “one-man-band” sourcing operation, everyone will face risks. Moreover, you can never reduce risk to zero. No matter how good your risk management program, there will always be someone who does something without considering the possible outcomes and impacts thoroughly, or simply faces a problem that couldn’t be anticipated or couldn’t be prevented. And thus you need to be able to react appropriately and have contingencies in place.  But a good awareness of the risks from the very beginning, along with regular (twice a year) reviews of your level of risk exposure, will go a long way to mitigating many of your operational risks.

I like that – it’s about mitigating operational risk through knowledge. Know the potential for problems, and know your current risk exposure.

Leverage – having a China presence changes the game

Tanya Crossman

Tanya Crossman

Today we’re looking at a recent post on Silk Road International. David talks about leverage, and how even a careful buyer can get into trouble when they don’t have enough of it.

David uses two cases studies to illustrate this. In one case, good preparation did not make up for a lack of in-person inspection, and a whole shipment of bad product resulted.

They had done almost everything correct.  But they didn’t have on-sight QC and when their product showed up incorrect, the small percentage (10%) they had retained for just this kind of situation was not enough to compensate for an entire order of unusable product.

In the second case, the company again prepared well, but full payment upfront meant there was no leverage for fixing problems down the track.

Both companies had the same basic problem–without some sort of physical presence in the factory neither of them had any leverage.  Once there were production problems (that cost time and/or money to resolve) the factory had no incentive to fix or replace anything.  And since neither of the companies had a presence in China they had no means of enforcing any of their demands (or even their originally contracted standards). I’d like to say that this is unusual and these two companies just had bad luck.  But the reality is that this is more common that not.

Having a presence in China makes a big difference when it comes to leverage in negotiations. If your supplier knows you can just get in a car or on a train and visit in a few hours’ time, he has greater incentive to keep you happy, and to resolve any problems that arise. If he knows you will visit to inspect product in the factory during production, he has a greater incentive to watch over production quality. If you are not in China yourself, having a trusted employee or agent on the ground can help.

Tying payments to QC inspection reports helps a ton.  As does being in the factory for critical production points (or having someone represent you there).  Remember, if you’re not doing your own QC or at least tying payments to QC reports, you’ve got no reason to expect that you’ll get what you’ve contracted for–you have no way to enforce your standards and the factory has no incentive not to save as much money as possible.

The important thing is to give the factory an incentive to meet your requirements (be it in terms of quality, punctuality, or cost). We regularly work with small factories. This makes us a higher priority customer (our orders form a larger part of the factory’s bottom line) but quality control can be a big issue in the beginning. We use a range of methods to improve quality. Continuing to work with the same factory over time, however, has many long term benefits, not the least of which being the build up of guanxi.

Our strategies included:

  • sending out own staff to train the factory’s quality inspectors
  • a contract stipulating we only pay for items that have passed our own independent QC (items than failed inspection were returned; we would pay for any that were suitably rectified and sent back to us)
  • a bonus for orders with a defect rate under 10%
  • when quality standards rose across the board, we focussed on improving adherence to schedule

One last point from David’s article:

It’s the same thing if you’re sourcing product or asking for samples.  If there is no incentive other than your word that “I’m going to place a really big order–there is so much potential here for us to make a ton of money!” then there is probably no chance that you’ll be anyone’s priority project… Remember, foreign clients are now a serious RISK.  The tables have turned in the last three years and you are now seen as a liability not an opportunity until you prove otherwise.  Without significant leverage, budget-conscious risk-adverse Chinese factories will just not take the gamble.

It’s a big risk to assume that as a foreign buyer you are automatically an attractive customer that any supplier would love to have. Even if you have been buying from China a long time, a new factory has no guarantee that you will buy big from them. There’s no shortcut – be a good customer, and over time you will prove yourself worthy of a supplier’s best efforts.

The changing role of a leader

Danny Coyle

Danny Coyle

The role of the leader

There’s so much stuff on leadership out there.  Here’s another 2 cents to add to the pile.

I’m finding that my role is changing.  Where I used to be the cheerleader, both cheering and leading, rallying the troops in a more public and energetic way, I’m finding that my leadership these days is more like a shepherd.  I’m watching the flock for any sick sheep that might need a little more care and attention.  Giving the kind word when it’s needed. Doing a lot more one-on-one, rather than the big dance in front of everyone.

As the company evolves and goes through it’s phases, I’m learning how to read the situations and respond to what our internal business needs are.  It’s a lot of fun to watch our company change.

I’m sure that I’ll be back into the public and energizing role in the future, but I find that I personally enjoy the shepherd role a lot.

Have you noticed the nature of your own leadership role change over time?

Intuition and the “gut feeling” that gets you out of trouble

Tanya Crossman

Tanya Crossman

Fashion Incubator is a great blog focussed on pattern making. We don’t often link to it as while it is fascinating to me it doesn’t generally overlap the topics we cover on Imports Oriental. Kathleen posted a really interested article the other week, however, which I wanted to bring to your attention.

She talks about intuition, and the importance of paying attention to it, especially in business. She tells a story about a time where investigating a gut feeling regarding a certain project enabled her to escape the worst of what could have been a very big mess.

In terms we typically define it, intuition is a gut level impression we get about a person or situation and for which we are at a loss to understand why… understanding the mechanisms of intuition allows me to move from indecision to informed understanding.

Kathleen talks about intuition as the “back brain” – the forebrain thinks logically, according to information obviously available, while the back brain deals with more subtle “cues”. Those cues may not be articulated as evidence of a problem, but are more like red flags – markers that “this” often means “that” is happening underneath. So the gut feeling isn’t saying “here is what’s wrong”; rather, it is part of you noticing a pattern that in other situations has been connected to a problem under the surface.

You go out to dinner with somebody you’re thinking of doing business with. They are pleasant enough, the details seem equitable but your intuition tells you something is amiss. Problem is, there’s nothing your fore brain can interpret as being a rational cause of discomfort but still, your dis-ease persists. I know what many people (most of them women) do, because you can’t articulate exactly what’s bugging you, you elect to give them the benefit of the doubt because that’s the only fair thing to do. Right? Well, maybe you shouldn’t. First you should try to pull cues from the situation which can help the back brain to communicate.

The next time you have a bad feeling, you need to map it. Clear your mind and write down any and every single misgiving you have no matter how stupid, trivial, childish or germane to the situation. Things like, do they salt their food before they even taste it? You don’t want to be involved in manufacturing or engineering with someone who does that, no way no how (long story). Many things may seem like emotional reactions that have nothing to do with business or being fair or open minded -you know, giving the benefit of the doubt in the absence of proofs. These are cues your inarticulate deep brain has put together in a pattern but does not have the means to tell your front brain. As you do this, more things will occur to you that you hadn’t recognized before. You won’t get too far into it before you realize that a pattern has emerged and your course of action is clearer.

I was particularly struck by the comment about people who salt their food before eating. I often do that myself. Once I stopped to think what that might say about a person, I was stunned. Salting food before eating it means I’ve made an assumption that the food before me will not be to my liking before I’ve even tasted it! I also have a tendency to make assumptions about people and situations before investigating them properly. It’s clearly a flaw, and while I am capable of changing my quickly-made-up mind, I waste time and offend people in the process.

Back to the topic, though; I think this is great advice. Investigating a “bad feeling” may seem like  a bad idea. You’re under a deadline, and you have no logical reason to delay. However, if that investigation leads you to an early warning, it may save you big time in the future. Think of such thinking time as an investment in the future of the deal you’re working on.

The point is, if you have a gut reaction without rational reasons, your deep brain is trying to tell you it has put the cues together. Give it a chance to speak so you can move forward decisively without feeling guilty that you haven’t given someone the benefit of the doubt.

Read the full article on Fashion Incubator here.

Listening Part III: Powerful Listening

Danny Coyle

Danny Coyle

In the past two weeks Jill has shared some insights on the topic of listening (see Part 1 and Part 2 of our series on Listening). I have also been experimenting with listening lately.  I am not strong in caring about people, listening to their problems, and engaging them on a deep level, especially if we do not already have a strong friendship.

I am only starting to realize that I have a very hard heart; I really don’t care that much about people. That needs to change.  My listening skills are a reflection of that.  I often want to turn the conversation so I can talk about my ideas, my achievements and my skills.  That is not loving to anyone (it’s really a form of hatred).

I’ve been trying to train myself to listen more deeply – to shut off my mouth and instead listen to people with my heart. I try to clear my brain of all tangents and just focus on what a person is saying.

Recently, I was listening to the wife of a friend talk about a struggle she was having.  I wasn’t really deeply listening.  I could sense that she was taking the conversation deeper, but since I wasn’t listening deeply, she wasn’t going to engage the conversation deeply.  It was like she just stuck her toe in the water, found it was quite cold, and recoiled.

I realized that the reason she recoiled was because I wasn’t listening to her heart. I decided to try to listen better in the next few moments. As I was making that decision in my mind, her husband walked up and entered the discussion.  I tried to focus on the words they were saying; I just let them talk.  I tried to ask questions that clarified the situation for me, and questions that tried to pull out the true meaning of what they were saying.

I was amazed at the depth of the conversation now taking place.  The only factor I could point to that was different was my attitude in listening to them.

I am amazed at the difference that listening can make.

I’ve been practicing it with my wife as well, and our conversations have gone deeper.  I can’t believe how loving, powerful and simple true listening can be.

Here are some tips that I’ve found that really help to listen carefully.

  1. Don’t let your brain run away on a tangent when someone else is talking.
  2. Look at the other person in the eye as if you are really listening to them – because you are listening to them.  Eye contact is key.
  3. Engage your heart.  Let yourself care about what they are saying.
  4. Do not try to fit your ideas into their words.  Ask clarifying questions if needed, but don’t assume they are saying something they are not.
  5. Be patient and let them do the talking.  They will finish when they are finished.  The point is not about getting your own ideas in, but about letting the other person feel loved.

Listening Part II– one of the most powerful tools you can learn

Jill Coyle

Jill Coyle

(Read Part I here)

Listening is powerful. I wouldn’t have believed it if I hadn’t started to experience it for myself over the last year. I wasn’t a very good listener before – and I certainly have a long way to go. The funny thing is that learning to be a better listener has also helped me (i.e. in helping others, I’ve helped myself). I’ve overcome tensions with people, I’ve faced intimidating people more easily, I’ve helped people uncover some powerful truths about themselves (and man, it was SO exciting!). Here are a few things that I’ve seen work for me.

Helpful tips in learning to be a better listener

Actually Listen

Pretty simply, try to actually listen to what the person is saying. Don’t be thinking of the next thing you’d like to say or about where you should go for lunch – and don’t be thinking about “how can I change this to a subject I have lots to say about.” Instead, give the person your attention (don’t be doing SMS or email while he’s talking) and listen.

Engage

Very simple again – but make sure to look at the person when they’re talking. And be engaging. Don’t look bored (even if you are!). Try to look the person in the eye and give them your full attention. If you’re having a conversation with someone on the phone, make listening noises like “uh huh” or “ok” to let the person know that you are listening.

Go Deeper – Investigate & Ask Questions

Try to find out what things mean to the person. Ask questions related to the subject that they’re talking about. If it’s an industry you don’t understand, ask questions about it. If it’s a hobby that they’re enthusiastic about, find out why they love that hobby so much. Find what makes that person tick. Ask them how this (experience, relationship, business) relates to their life in general.

Attitude – It’s NOT all about me

A wise friend and mentor, Vivian Peebles, gave some great advice to me when I was going into a particularly hairy meeting where I was rather intimidated by the bigwigs that were going to be there with me. She said, “Be prepared for the meeting – and then forget about yourself. Ask about them. Ask about their business, how they got started, where they’re from, about their kids.” And you know? I found this to be such a powerful tool. Not only was I a lot less nervous about facing these people – but I found that they were much more open with me, because I was showing an interest in them.

We as human beings generally find it easy to talk about ourselves and our interests.

Ask about someone else’s, for a change – and see if it doesn’t change your life!

Share some stories on how listening has changed your life – either someone really listening to you…or you listening to someone else!

Listening Part I – Are you a conversation thief?

Jill Coyle

Jill Coyle

I learned something about myself a couple months ago – something I really didn’t like. Through a series of events, I learned that I like to hijack conversations. What does this mean? Finishing people’s sentences, thinking of my answer before the person is done talking, taking what the person is saying and trying to figure out how to get it onto a topic that I’m more expert in, etc. A friend (as a joke, I hope) has even offered to make me a T-shirt that says “reformed conversation hijacker.”

“Hijacking conversations” is a skill I’ve learned in business where things move at lightning speed – and finishing each other’s conversations is actually a skill. When I have been working with team leaders and we can finish each other’s sentences, this means that we’re on the same page, that we know where the other person is going, etc. It’s a great skill.

Also, time is money – right? So let’s move things along, people. If I know where the conversation is going and the person is taking FOR-E-VER getting to the point, I like to cut in (hopefully at a tactful place) and cut to the chase.

And sure, I am not trying to undermine “hijacking” as a skill. It is a skill. And completely necessary to busy managers or bosses who are trying to get things done but have dozens of people clamoring for their attention.

However, I’ve found that – especially in the relational part of business (and let’s face it: you have relationships with your staff, boss, customers, etc, whether you like it or not) – this is a detriment rather than a skill.

If you don’t believe me, go home tonight and finish your spouse’s conversation all throughout dinner and see how he/she reacts.

Probably not very positively, eh?

The people you work with – or have working under you – need for you to listen. They also need to know that you can give them space to listen. If they see you as distant and unapproachable – sure, they won’t bother you with some of their nonsense…but they probably also won’t come to you with the good ideas that are churning around in their heads.

Things you can do:

  • Don’t squash people’s ideas.
  • Have more patience.
  • Listen just a bit longer – there might be a diamond in the rough.

So there is a time and a place for “hijacking” – but I’m convinced we’re all pretty good at this. I think many of us need to focus more on LISTENING.

In Part II, we’ll talk about a couple tips to being a Better Listener.

What about you? Do you feel like your boss listens to you? Do you think listening is a problem at your work place? Any tips on being a good listener?

The 2 Kinds of “Yes”

Danny Coyle

Danny Coyle

I recently found myself in a position where I need to make a quick decision to suspend operations in a department.  I spoke with some of my mentors about it, and they said it was a good idea.  I was not in a place to have a physical meeting with my top leaders, so I sent them an e-mail detailing the decision that needed to be made.

We all decided to suspend the operation for the time-being and go ahead with the plan.  With the decision made and plans moving forward, I was surprised when two of my top leaders came to me later. They asked questions indicating insecurity regarding the decision we had made together.

I then realized I had not received the “yes” I had expected.

When leading a team, beware of the 2 kinds of “yes”.

Before I describe the two kinds of “yes”, there are two components to engaging a team of leaders in a decision.  These components are Heart and Mind.

When making key decisions, your team needs to say “yes” with their minds. They need to think through all the positive and negative outcomes of the decision, along with resource consumption, potential output, etc. Those questions must be asked and answered in a rational way. A good decision will not be made without engaging the Mind.

You also need to engage the Heart. Your team needs to feel that the rational decision is the best one – to have that “gut feeling” that what is logical is also right overall. Even if your team has thought through the plan and engaged with the Mind, unless they also engage with the Heart, they will be prone to uncertainty. When you can engage their hearts beforehand, a new venture has a much better chance at success.

That said, here are the 2 kinds of yes.

The ‘We are with you’ Yes

Sometimes a leader connects with his team in a way that brings the team on board 100%. The team is behind the leader, supporting the new direction, convinced that it is the best way forward. This happens when the leader engages both the Minds and Hearts of the team. When a team is engaged like this, they are willing to fight to bring about the vision; they will jump through rings of fire to make it happen.

The ‘No one will get killed’ yes

Sometimes a team will go along with new direction while remaining unconvinced that it is the best way forward. They say “yes,” but what they really mean is “not no”. This happens when the leader fails to engage his team on a Heart level; the decision making is happening on a purely Mind level. The team can’t find a logical reason to say “no,” can’t find anything to say that will dissuade the strong leader from going forward with the plan. Team members not engaged on a Heart level are not sold on the decision they have made. Later, when facing the consequences of the decision, they will not strongly support the new direction, and may try to wiggle out of their part in it.

The second type of yes happens when the leader does not do a good job of engaging his team and winning their hearts for the decision. This lack is compounded when the leader doesn’t stop to check whether the team is engaged during the decision-making process. The team may be saying yes on a practical level, without it ever being a whole-hearted, “we are with you!” sort of yes. A good decision is of course a rational decision, but the heart is a critical component of the “yes” you need from your team. They must be fully engaged both in Mind and Heart in order for a new venture to fully succeed.

Most of the time, people don’t have the vocabulary or courage to explain that a leader has not engaged their hearts.  It is up to the leader to determine if the heart of the team is engaged or not.  This is a challenging task, and worthy of another post.

In my case, the decision to temporarily shut down the operation in question for a time was the right decision, and we reaped the rewards for this decision. I learned a valuable lesson without paying a big price in negative consequences – dodged a bullet with that one! On the other hand, I missed an opportunity to engage the hearts of my team. If I were to do it again, I would give more scrutiny to the position of their hearts before making, and moving forward with, the decision.

Next time we make a big decision like this, I know that I’ll be looking for them to say yes with their not only minds, but with their hearts as well.